Chinedu Nwoke: Open Response to His Excellency, President Donald John Trump on Proposed U.S. Military Action Against Nigeria.

Responding to President Trump’s Declaration of Possible Military Action Against Nigeria

U.S. President Donald J. Trump declared that he had instructed the United States Department of Defense to prepare for possible military action against Nigeria. This statement, reportedly in response to the persecution of Christians, has caused widespread concern both within Nigeria and among international observers.

As concerned citizen, Chinedu Iheanacho Nwoke a Nigerian entrepreneur believe it is important to clarify the realities on the ground and highlight the potential dangers of any such military action. Nigeria is not the aggressor, it is a primary victim of terrorism. Boko Haram, ISWAP, armed bandits, and violent herdsmen militias continue to terrorize communities across the country. Targeting Nigeria as a whole would risk punishing innocent civilians and destabilizing the entire West African sub-region.

It is also essential to recall the history of U.S.-Nigeria interactions in counter-terrorism. Requests for support under President Goodluck Jonathan were denied, key documents related to political figures were delayed or ignored, and partisan campaigns overshadowed real assistance. History teaches us that interventions framed as solutions, without a clear strategy or focus on the actual perpetrators, often exacerbate crises.

In light of these facts, Chinedu Nwoke have issued an official response to President Trump’s declaration. Shared below in full, as the articulation and position on this urgent matter.

Official Response to His Excellency, President Donald John Trump on Proposed U.S. Military Action Against Nigeria

(As authored by Chinedu Nwoke, November 2, 2025)

Open Response to His Excellency, President Donald John Trump on Proposed U.S. Military Action Against Nigeria.

Dear President Trump,

We acknowledge your recent statement declaring that you have instructed the United States Department of Defense to prepare for a possible military action against

Nigeria in response to reports of the persecution and killing of Christians. We do appreciate your concern for the safety of Christians and other vulnerable

communities, it is important to clarify that Nigeria as a nation is not the aggressor but one of the primary victims of terrorism.

Nigeria continues to endure relentless attacks from Boko Haram, ISWAP, armed Bandits(though Terrorists, but rebranded by Ex President Buhari), and violent herdsmen

militias, whose victims include mostly Christians, however, Muslims alike. Your concern, Mr. President, should rightly be directed toward these terrorist and criminal

groups, not at the Nigerian state or its citizens. Any military action against Nigeria would risk punishing the victims rather than the perpetrators, while

destabilizing the entire West African sub-region.

It is worth recalling that under President Goodluck Jonathan’s administration, Nigeria sought U.S. military assistance to confront Boko Haram, but that request was

denied by the Obama administration. Instead of providing intelligence or arms support, the U.S. government appeared to take a partisan stance, joining the then-

opposition party, the All Progressives Congress (APC-Now Incumbent), in the “Bring Back Our Girls” campaign, while offering no concrete help to Nigeria’s actual

counter-terrorism efforts.

Furthermore, the U.S. government has delayed or ignored the release of key documents relating to President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s criminal and forfeiture cases in the

United States, documents that could have shaped the outcome and integrity of Nigeria’s electoral process in 2023. Despite this, Washington sent delegates to President

Tinubu’s inauguration(A Man they would not allow step foot in US soil for criminal reasons), signaling political approval while sidestepping questions of transparency.

You cannot claim to be the solution while enabling the problem. That is a classic American-style “Devil’s Gift”. Policies that promise help yet end up deepening the

crisis they claim to solve. Given this history, it is difficult to accept that the same United States which once withheld crucial assistance and tolerated questionable

actors now seeks to justify military action against Nigeria in the name of protecting Christians. Mr. President, this course of action appears unclear, inconsistent,

and clouded by sentiment rather than genuine strategy.

There is a long history of U.S. interventions launched in the name of fighting terrorism that instead strengthened extremist groups and plunged nations into avoidable

chaos. Afghanistan remains the most striking example: after two decades of American “intervention”, the Taliban returned to full power, leaving behind suffering and

instability. There is every reason to fear a similar failure if such an approach is repeated in Nigeria. It often seems almost deliberate that countries receiving U.S.

military “help” against terrorism eventually fall under deeper extremist control. Nigeria needs help, not exploitation. We seek partnership that strengthens our

sovereignty and resilience, not intervention that leaves destruction and dependency.

The real battle lies in dismantling the financial and political networks that sustain terrorism. We urge the United States to direct its power and intelligence toward

identifying, exposing, and prosecuting the sponsors, financiers, and enablers of Boko Haram, ISWAP, bandits(As rebranded by Ex President Buhari), and herdsmen

militias.
Reports including those from the United Arab Emirates, have identified such financiers. That intelligence should be made public and acted upon through lawful

international channels, not buried or selectively used.

Allegations that certain political and religious figures(Sheik Gummi was recent deported from Saudi Arabia for Terrorism concerns) have aided or shielded terrorist

actors demand independent investigation and due process. If credible evidence exists, it should be presented to Nigerian and international judicial authorities,

ensuring accountability within the rule of law, not used as justification for broad military action against an entire country.

Threatening a “possible military action” against Nigeria is vague, disproportionate, and counterproductive. Such rhetoric risks harming civilians, undermining

sovereignty, and empowering extremist propaganda. True allies should pursue intelligence cooperation, capacity-building, and diplomatic engagement, not intimidation.

We call upon you, Mr. President, and the United States government to collaborate with Nigerian security agencies(Under credible leadership, devoid of questionable

characters) through joint counter-terrorism initiatives and intelligence sharing, impose targeted sanctions on verified financiers and arms traffickers, expand

humanitarian assistance to victims and displaced families, release relevant judicial and intelligence documents to strengthen transparency and democratic

accountability, and promote constructive engagement with Nigeria and regional partners (ECOWAS, AU, UN) to build sustainable peace and stability.

Mr. President, Nigeria is not your enemy. We share a common enemy-Terrorism. The Nigerian people, both Christians and Muslims, have endured unimaginable suffering at

the hands of extremists. What our nation seeks is solidarity, not hostility; partnership, not class-act punishment. Nigerians love America. In fact, Nigerians may be

among the few people in the world who love the United States out of pure emotional admiration, not for political gain or economic favor. We have enjoyed a long history

of friendship and cooperation between our two nations. Nigeria is not, and has never been, hostile toward the United States.

We therefore appeal to you, Dear President Trump, please, do not put Nigeria on the path of Afghanistan. Let history remember this moment not for another tragedy, but

for the wisdom to choose peace and partnership over destruction.

Respectfully,
Signed:
Chinedu Iheanacho Nwoke
2nd November, 2025

P.S. “If anything, the White House will consider fomenting disruption in a hostile nation a positive development”- Amanda Waller (The Suicide Squad 2021). “I’m a

little bit country” (Southpark Season 7, Episode 4)… Both cinematic examples illustrate a familiar pattern in U.S. foreign policy. Presenting interventions as

solutions while sometimes creating or worsening the very problems they aim to solve.

know more: www.padi.ng www.curiouscity.ng